I am not sure that I've ever used this blog for anything but showcasing my love for my family and keeping in touch with loved ones, but I just had to write about this.
I was just watching the local news at noon and heard the most ridiculous thing ever. This is so indicative of "progressive" Canadian politics and laws and it makes me sick. In Quebec, when a couple gets married, the woman is not legally allowed to take her husband's last name. Even if she wants to. Now, I am not against women who choose to keep their last name when they get married. I think that is a personal choice. But I do believe that a woman should have the choice!! The news story said that if a woman wants to legally take on her husband's last name, she has to apply to legally change her name, which is generally not granted for the reason of "marriage."
Beyond having your government tell you that you cannot change your last name, which upsets me at every level, I have to think about the effects of this: what will doing geneaology be like when a woman doesn't have the same last name as her children? How does it affect record-keeping in the Church (and otherwise)? Anyways, I just had to assert my opinion. This isn't a new law, it's about 25 years old, and it was considered a major "win" for the feminist movement. Now there is a call for government to change the law and let women choose. What do you think about this? Am I just a little too uptight? Does this really matter? Would it matter to you?
Friday, August 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
I would say I'm there with you. It should be a woman's choice and the government shouldn't make it so difficult for the change to take place.
As far as the geneology stuff goes, it is an interesting battle for other European cultures. A lot of women don't take on their husbands' names. However, their kids do inherit a surname from each parent, so that makes it easier to track parentage. But it is still a big headache to figure out who is married to whom. In fact, it was a headache dealing with living people sometimes. You just weren't ever positive about some poeple's relationships in the ward...:)
Yeah, that's not cool. It's one thing to be against it, but to make a law saying that you can't, that's extreme. I mean, that should be a choice of those who are getting married. Interesting.
Oh, and can I add my vote to the "get rid of the cornea-searing red background"? Because I vote for that. :)
I have to agree with you Emily and the other 2 comments. That is just crazy. I'd never heard of that. Cory served his mission in Quebec so I'll have to talk to him about this one.
Okay, Laurel, your opinions on my blog layout have been noted and I took the offensive color off. I guess that's what I get for trying something different!
That is unreal! Let us know what happens. Glad to see some new pics. Too fun. : )
Sweet! My comments DO make a difference! :) Yeah, it was just a little bit much. I like the idea of color, don't get me wrong, it was just a lot. Heehee.
hey emily! thought i'd say hi. i haven't checked your blog in awhile because i lost the addy! do you mind if i link to your blog so i won't lose it again? ;)
nicole
wow, I am with you on that...makes you really appreciate having a system here{in amaerica} that has so many "checks and balances" that things like that would never become law...be thankful for congress
You are totally justified in what you have said concerning this ridiculous law. Time to move back to the states...although we have our own issues, as you well know. But at least you could shop at Target again. :) LOL
Post a Comment